Talk:Terminology

From FIRSTwiki

I definitley see the usefulness and possibility of a terminology page with terminology specific to FIRST, but if its going to contain all technical terms that might be involved in FIRST, it is definitley impossible, not useful, and therefore a waste of time. Unless the author can explain the purpose of this page a bit better, I will suggest it for deletion. --Max 21:53, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT)

I agree. Tx and Rx should be Wikipedia links, not local. If noone can come up with FIRST specific terms, this page (and TX and RX should be deleted) --Astronouth7303 21:34, 23 Sep 2004 (EDT)