Drive train
From FIRSTwiki
 | Please help improve this article or section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
A robot's drive train consists of all of the components used to make the robot move around the field. Most drive trains use motors to spin wheels or drive treads (belts). Some innovative teams also incoporate pneumatics and servos to allow shifting of gears.
The drivetrain is by far the most important and crucial part of a robot. It may have other features, but without a functioning drive train those features are useless. Drive Trains can come in many different forms, each one having its own strengths and weaknesses. This overview will attempt to give an general synopsis of drive train do's and don'ts, as well as touch on the most common drive train incarnations.
Contents |
The Basics
The optimum drive train for a robot is one that finds the correct balance of speed, maneuverability, and pushing power to fit within a team's strategy. Speed and pushing power are, in most cases, inversely proportional to one another. Adjusting the balance between speed and pushing power is accomplished by adjusting the gearing ratios between the input (motors) and the output (wheels).
Maneuverability can be defined as the acceleration the robot can achieve in various directions. In the case of a skid steer robot maneuverability would probably be defined as the speed and the precision with which the robot can rotate. Maneuverability is much trickier to manipulate as it is the result of not only a robots speed and available torque, but of the drive train's geometry as well. A high level of maneuverability is very important in robot design, although it can be just as much a curse as it is a blessing if not correctly understood. A robot that is both extremely fast and extremely maneuverable will be almost impossible to control without a certain level of sophistication within its controls, this can take the form of either genuine closed loop software control (e.g. PID feedback loop), or an extensive open loop control system.
Types of Drive Trains
Two wheel drive
The two-wheel drive (aka "casterbot") is undeniably the easiest one to make. It offers high maneuverability while maintaining a very low level of complexity. It can also be the most difficult to use. A casterbot turns with such ease because there is virtually no side friction working against the wheels of the robot as it turns. However, that same ease of turning can be a nightmare - with no friction regulating the bot's speed of turning, its inertia will always want to continue turning even after the motors have stopped. This results in a robot that is extremely difficult to control using basic control methods - it is a rare casterbot that can drive in a straight line without the use of internal sensors or gyros. Furthermore, the unpowered surfaces in contact with the floor detract from available pushing power, and significantly lower a robot's ability to maintain its position when hit.
The design, for all its shortcomings, is nevertheless viable if correctly put to use. When designing a two-wheel drive train, the powered wheels should be in the center. This allows the robot's pivot point to remain close to its center of mass, minimizing the area through which it must travel in order to turn. Also, placing the powered wheels along the 30" sides of the robot will further slow its rate of turn, making it more controllable (helpful, but not necessary). A good example is 95's 2002 'bot.
Four Wheel Drive
The four-wheel drive system is probably the most common drive train used in FIRST. It offers a number of advantages and disadvantages over the more basic two wheel drive. With the addition of two extra driven wheels, a four wheel drive robot has more traction and control over a two wheel drive robot. The trade-off is the increased wheel base can cause problems turning (when the wheel base exceeds the wheel width.) A good example is 587's '05 bot.
Six Wheel Drive
The six-wheel drive robot is a moderately common type of drivetrain. It offers a good compromise between traction and maneuverability. Most teams choose to lower the center wheels by approximately 1/8 - 3/16", allowing the robot to turn more easily because normally it has a shortened wheel base but at the same time, can tip over slightly, and enjoy the benefits of a full length wheel base.
Some six wheel drive robots are in fact four wheel drive robots with an unpowered pair of extra wheels that just act to increase the wheel base for stability. When tipped to the unpowered set, some of its weight is diverted to unpowered wheels and traction is therefore reduced.
A good example of this kind of drivetrain is the 418 '05 bot.
If you hear any reference to a "West Coast drive" it is commonly refering to a Six Wheel Drive
Car Drive
A car drive (aka Ackerman Steering) robot has a steering system much like what you would find on a standard automotive vehicle. Usually, the drive train system has four wheels, with the two wheels in the back providing power, and the two wheels in the front providing steering, though there are designs with power and steering to all wheels. While the design gives increased speed and pushing power and reduces the learning curve for the driver, it is not a very common choice due to its lack of maneuverability. Generally, the large turning radius makes it very difficult to maneuver in a corner.
A good example of this type of drivetrain is the 612 '05 bot.
Swerve Drive
A swerve drive robot has the ability to rotate its wheels, allowing the robot to travel with three degrees of freedom. Several types exist, such as the crab drive, in which all four wheels are linked such that they always have the same angle as each other (generally requires one drive motor per wheel plus two angling motors). A 2+2 configuration has two pairs of wheels which share angles (typically requiring four drive motors plus two angle motors), and a full omni system allows each wheel to be independently angled (requires four drive motors and four angle motors - generally very time-, labor-, part-, and weight-intensive, though it has been done before; examples include Team 1810's 2007 robot).
The main advantage of a swerve drive is a great increase in maneuverability. The trade-offs are that swerve drives are much more complex to build and consume much more resources (time, money, weight) than most other drivetrains. Some forms of swerve drive are also known to have less power for pushing other robots around on the field. However, increased maneuverability is gained to make up for it. A good example is the 95 2003 robot.
Crab Drive
A crab drive allows the robot to strafe at any angle, but turning involves a great deal of skidding, sometimes even more than a typical four-wheel tank drive system (in which the power to the right and left wheels can be independently adjusted). A 2+2 configuration allows smoother turning (similar to a car drive system but with two sets of independently angled wheels) and the same omnidirectional strafing as a crab drive, but it cannot turn and strafe at the same time (the reasons for this are a bit complicated). Finally, a full omni system allows for any combination of strafing and turning simultaneously, as well as point turning. However, the increasing weight and complexity of the latter two designs leads many teams to use the simpler crab drive.
Holonomic Drive
A holonomic drive (aka omni drive) also allows a robot to travel with three degrees of freedom rather than two. The difference is that a holonomic drive allows a robot to instantly change direction without having to turn the wheels to a different position. The major benefit of using a holonomic drive is a great increase in maneuverability without having to add an entirely new mechanism to turn the wheels. The major trade-off is that the robot isn't very good when it comes to a pushing and shoving. Holonomic wheels have poor traction, as they can't be made inflatable or with treads. They also demand individual, speed controlled motors for each wheel.
An example of this type of drivetrain is team 2047s '07 bot.
Here is a video of team 1418's 2007 holonomic drive in action. Note the slight listing when the chassis is supposed to be driving straight; this was caused by asymmetries in the power outputs of the Victor speed controllers. This problem was successfully fixed by using a lookup table to force individual joystick positions to map to a linear set of power outputs.
Mecanum Drive
A mecanum drive is another omnidirectional drive system. It consist of wheels with their rollers angled in a conventional four wheel drive layout. With an independent motor/transmission on each wheel, omni driving can be achieved by varying speeds. Mecanum is hard to understand without a picture, so here is a picture of the 1595 robot in its incomplete state, showing the drivetrain quite clearly.
